Great. So things seem to back to normal, and you can seek more assistants in case you are absent next time - you need an active, working admin team if you want to change this wiki.
And it is about time for me to slip out of the activities here, and you should be able to handle tasks here so I don't need to be here. The wiki belongs to the fans those who're interested, while admins only need to control the loose, overall condition of the wiki (at least this is how I believe).
I have no idea where he is. Since I first visited here, he is almost as inactive as you've known. Like, I did even times of contributions than he has during his 5-year participation. But what do you mean by account hijacking? Is your account being hacked or something?
While the other admins, User:Guardiankfm120 and User:Molothrus Aeneus, I know as much as you do. Though maybe they did have edits from time to time, but honestly, at this year, the edits are just minor instead of anti-vandalism thing. Hope I can help you with this.
But I'm wondering that when will there be new admins appointed by bureaucrats
It can be quite slow according to their activity, no accurate timeline. They may be watching you for whether you are eligible, but the waiting can be really exhausting because you don't exactly know when the thing happens.
Frankly, anyone interested can start an adoption (if one meets the condition) to speed up the process to skip the admins, though it may be rude to them.
In fact, because the vandals will 100% vote agaist anyone to adpot the wiki, we'll have to just wait since it's really mean to just adpot here outright.
And, not a lot of people meet the condition
Eh, I doubt the vandalizers would even notice it (and the staff can see it clear who is disturbing), and you don't need a vote, you just need to say publicly that you want to be in charge, and notify the existing admin, and that's all. Be active doing your thing and pointing out what the problem the wiki is in are the only key.
Like I said, if you are sure you want to help, write a blog and refresh the main page button (you can find where it is) and wait. Then, this is your ticket and go ahead, though the waiting there is almost as equally long.
P.P.S. User:Kanazagr is a moderator, he helps to update Minion Rush info (which was my job), while User:MarkMinion is just an account I set to have bot function, though I consider to give it out to new admins to use it in the future.
Oh, and you need to give the links in the blog, of who are inactive, examples of vandal, why you want to adopt, just... put some necessary proof about why this wiki is in danger. The staff will consider based on these facts. And adoption is not that that aggressive, you can also say that you can let existing admins to have the places, just you want to be additional one.
Oganesson wrote: Oh, and you need to give the links in the blog, of who are inactive, examples of vandal, why you want to adopt, just... put some necessary proof about why this wiki is in danger. The staff will consider based on these facts. And adoption is not that that aggressive, you can also say that you can let existing admins to have the places, just you want to be additional one.
If your wiki is inactive then you may not need to worry (because most of the time, admins being removed is usually being reported or abusing powers), and months of inactivity is usually nothing to worry - also in inactive wikis.
"Affiliation" here means that the topic of a wiki has something in common with ours, such as company (Illumination Entertainment/Universal Studios) and genre, and there is a template of the main page, Template:Affwiki, in which the link to other wikis can be added or removed by admins. Usually, admins can decide which wikis are affiliated, and they can also decide whether to accept the affiliation requested by admins from other wikis.
Yoda the Disney Minion wrote:
How is Clive the tertiary antagonist when he is most likely secondary?
I know nothing, some of those changes aren't my edits. If you think the statements are inappropriate, you can go ahead changing it (or, you can have a discussion in the talk page). But seriously, I am now no longer doing with this wiki anymore.
Hi, there is a new vandal called "Shapekaka" on the wiki who's adding irrelevant and inappropriate content on the wiki and I need help with that. Could you block that user, delete the pages he created and revert the edits back to where they were if there's any recent destructive contributions by him which is on top?
That last user is himself a vandal, hence needs to be blocked — unless the VSTF have already done it. Given how inappropriate his presence (even his user name) is on a kids' wiki, I would recommend that you also purge all his edits (delete the page, select all revisions except his, and undelete those).
Thank for the alert! However, I will resign next year. So I'd like to ask you, are you interested in being an admin here? If so, please tell User:Guardiankfm120, seeing that how long you've been here, perhaps longer than I have, so I think you are a good candidate!